We have a number of suggestions to shorten the time until you are able to show positive earnings.

Generally, also, the subordinator "until" makes more sense when the verb in the main clause is negative: "We won't be able to close the deal until you arrive." (And don't use "until" when you mean "before.")

Authority: A Grammar of Contemporary English by Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. Longman Group: London. 1978. pages 744 and 780.

1. In questions (routinely): "Have you eaten breakfast yet?" "Are you ready?"
2. In attributing speech: "'Help me!' cried Farmer Brown."
3. To give prominence to a particular word or phrase: "Most important is the chapter dealing with ordnance."
4. After negatives: "I don't believe a word she says, nor does my brother. Come to think of it, neither does her father."
5. After so: "I believe her; so does my brother."
6. For emphasis and literary effect: "Into the valley of death rode the five hundred. . . ."
   And there are others, but most of a strained or literary effect.

   Authority: The New Fowler's Modern English Usage edited by R.W. Burchfield. Clarendon Press: Oxford, England. 1996. Used with the permission of Oxford University Press. (under "inversion") Examples my own.

Thanks!

In "'It is hungry, the little one,' she said, petting the small raccoon," the phrase "the little one" is what Quirk and Greenbaum call an identification appositive, in which a nonspecific term is followed up by a more specific term that identifies or makes more clear the meaning of the first appositive. (Sometimes, you could insert the word "namely" when you're using this kind of appositive — not that you'd want to in this sentence, but it demonstrates how the appositives are working.)

Authority: A Grammar of Contemporary English by Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. Longman Group: London. 1978. p. 629-30.

Thank you!

With adjectives, we see the recursive process at work in "She was the tall, elderly woman." This indicates that among elderly women, she was the tall one. In other words, the order in which one modifier comes after (is tucked into) another is not without consequence.

Authority: Understanding English Grammar by Martha Kolln. 4rth Edition. MacMillan Publishing Company: New York. 1994. p. 181.

"Slew" — like group, gang, class, throng, crowd — would always be regarded as a plural in British English. In American English, it is apt to be singular, but it can be either, depending on whether you're thinking of the individuals within the slew as discrete individuals or as one unit. I rather imagine — given what I know of the behavior of professional athletes, wizardly or not — that they're looking out for themselves — individually, selfishly, atomistically, and pluralistically — and I would therefore lean toward the plural verb, "have gone on to. . . . " But the headline as written is not wrong if the writer is thinking of the "slew" as a group acting as one thing (which is hard to believe considering the fact that those Wizards couldn't behave as a unit when they were on the same team, which is one reason, among many, that they are now ex-Wizards).

Smith, John, Jr.
Smith, John B., III

Help!