The
Grammar
Logs
# 382
QUESTION Is it "prize possession" or "prized possession"? SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE New York, New York Tue, Mar 21, 2000 GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE Either one. "Prized" can mean "treasured," "esteemed." But the word "prize" can also mean "outstanding of a kind" well, pretty much the same thing. Authority for this note: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Electronic Edition. 1994. Used with permission.
QUESTION We have a proposal containing the following sentence: "Any change to such price will be thoroughly discussed with XYZ Company and mutually agreed." I feel we need to add "upon" after agreed. This was written by our legal department (which has been wrong before) - is it "legalese"? SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE Princeton, New Jersey Tue, Mar 21, 2000 GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE According to Burchfield, the use of "agree" without a prepositional complement (to, with, upon, etc.) is common in the legal world but still controversial (among grammarians, anyway) in England, but is virtually unheard of in the U.S. (outside of Princeton, anyway). I think you need the "upon." Authority: The New Fowler's Modern English Usage edited by R.W. Burchfield. Clarendon Press: Oxford, England. 1996. (under "agree") Used with the permission of Oxford University Press.
QUESTION I have a question regarding the usage of "each"--I know it can function as both a pronoun and an adverb. In the sentence: Mike, Bob, Sue, and Jane each has a dog, is "each" functioning as a pronoun or an adverb? Should it be "has" or "have"? Thanks for your help. SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE Raleigh, North Carolina Wed, Mar 22, 2000 GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE Burchfield describes this situation this way: When each immediately follows a plural pronominal subject the following verb is in the plural: "We each have our own priorities." . . . When each is not the subject, but is in apposition with a plural noun or pronoun as subject, the verb (and any complement) is invariably plural: "The three parties each have a right to a confidential briefing.So the answer to your question is that it's a pronoun in that situation, and you want the plural verb "have."Authority: The New Fowler's Modern English Usage edited by R.W. Burchfield. Clarendon Press: Oxford, England. 1996. Used with the permission of Oxford University Press.
QUESTION Because of the sentence order, I am having a hard time with the plurality of the word "exists" in the following: "I have discovered that there exists things that do, in fact, stagger the velocity of time."This sounds correct to my ear. However, the "s" at the end of "exists" and at the end of "things" do not seem to match. I've even tried replacing "exists" with "are" and "is" and feel that "are" is right. Could you please tell me if my ear is correct. Also, could you explain why I might be having such a problem with this.Thank you,
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE Toronto, Ontario Wed, Mar 22, 2000 GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE Within this noun clause (which begins with "that"), you have an expletive construction "there exist things. . . ." In such a construction, the subject follows the verb but still determines the number of the verb. The subject is plural, so we need a plural verb, "exist." The problem with the sentence is the expletive construction itself. If you can avoid it, you're better off: "I have discovered that things exist that do, in fact, . . . ." I should note that some writers contend that "there" is what they call an "existential subject" and should be regarded as singular. Thus they would say, "There is a man and a woman in the foyer" (instead of are). Although this will sometimes happen in casual speech, in formal and academic prose, we allow the actual subject (which follows the verb) to determine the number of the verb.
QUESTION When writing about birds should I capitalize the names? For example Eastern Bluebird, or Bobolink or do these names stay lowercase? Thanks
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE Amherst, Massachusetts Fri, Mar 24, 2000 GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE In general the same rule applies to animals that applies to plants. Don't capitalize their names unless the name is derived from another proper noun. The birds you name above would remain in the lower case. But Baltimore oriole, for example, gets the "B" of Baltimore capitalized.
QUESTION Is 12:00am the same thing as midnight? Is 12:00pm the same thing as noon? Thank you!
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Fri, Mar 24, 2000 GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE Actually, it's the other way around. Midnight is part of the day which is just coming to an end; it's twelve post meridian (after mid-day, which starts after noon). So midnight is 12 p.m. and noon is 12 before mid-day because it belongs to the morning, not the afternoon. I hope this explanation hasn't completely confused you.
QUESTION On question 4 of:
http://webster.commnet.edu/shr-cgi-shl/quiz.pl/sensen/its_there_quiz.htm
it asks:
His fear of ____ being a very long season seemed contagious.
1) its
2) it's
Now I'm no grammar expert but I believe that that is incorrect.
Please look into this and contact the correct person involved.
Thank youSOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE Brookfield, Wisconsin Fri, Mar 24, 2000 GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE The quiz indicates that "its" would be the correct choice for that sentence, and the quiz is correct. "It's" would mean "it is," which wouldn't make sense there. We need the possessive form of "it" because "being" (a gerund) belongs to "it." Thank you, though, for keeping us honest.
QUESTION When do I use 'amid' versus 'amidst' and when do I use 'among' versus 'amongst'? SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE Allentown, Pennsylvania Fri, Mar 24, 2000 GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE Both "amid" and "amidst" are rather fussy words; "in the midst of" is probably a good substitute. "Amid" is far, far more common than "amidst." "Amongst" is rarely used in American English; it's somewhat more common in British English. I'd stick with "among." (They mean the same.) Authority: The New Fowler's Modern English Usage edited by R.W. Burchfield. Clarendon Press: Oxford, England. 1996. Used with the permission of Oxford University Press.
QUESTION I just read something on CNN that I found strange. Here it is, paraphrased: "The agreement will be approved this week by an (a???) European Commission committee. "I just read your section on the indefinite articles "a" and "an", and I found the "h" exception to the consonant rule. Is there also a Y-sound exception to the consonant rule? Or is this a CNN typo?SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Wed, Mar 29, 2000 GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE We'd use "a" before "European" because that word begins with consonantal "yoo" sound. I can't tell from your example which article CNN actually used. If they used "an," they made a mistake.
Previous Grammar Log