QUESTION |
Dear Grammar,
I need your assistance on use of the word "nary." My proposed sentence is this: "Effortlessly benevolent and cheerful even at dawn, Good Samaritans fling themselves into servicing their fellow man with nary a hint of grumbling." Unsure about proper usage, I checked the dictionary, which basically informed me that the "a" after "nary" is incorrect, because "nary" means "not one" or "no." Nonetheless, I have never heard the word used without the "a" following it. What is correct?
Thanks
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
San Jose, California Mon, Apr 5, 1999
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
Burchfield says that "nary" seems to be derived from "never a"; the Oxford American says it means "not any." In either case, the word is always followed by "a," as you have always heard it used. Whatever dictionary you used is incorrect.
Authority: The New Fowler's Modern English Usage edited by R.W. Burchfield. Clarendon Press: Oxford, England. 1996.
Authority for this note: Oxford American Dictionary: Oxford University Press, New York. 1980.
|
QUESTION |
Would the following sentence be an acceptable one:
"We have a new partner in Zenith Marketing."
Or am I required to use a sentence such as this.
"We have a new partner, Zenith Marketing."
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Akron, Ohio Mon, Apr 5, 1999
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
I don't see anything wrong with that sentence. It's sort of like "We have a good friend in Bob," isn't it? I'm not sure where that idiom comes from, but it seems to have become an acceptable way of saying things, at least in American speech. In really formal prose, you might be better off with your second version, and you might be even better off by letting your sentence actually say something about Zenith: "Our new partner, Zenith Marketing, is a premier. . . ." But I doubt if anyone would raise an eyebrow at the first version.
|
QUESTION |
Would you tell me what is the difference between IN SPITE OF and DESPITE, and give me some examples please ?
I know it is almost the same but there is a little difference.
Thanks a lot.
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico Tue, Apr 6, 1999
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
In general use, there isn't enough difference to worry about. From what I gather from the dictionaries I have (not adequate, really, to this task), I think "in spite of" has an air of defiance or even contempt about it that "despite" probably does not measure up to. The online Merriam-Webster's includes each word as a synonym in the definition of the other.
- She played despite her hip injury.
- She played in spite of her coach's instructions.
|
QUESTION |
I heard recently that substituting the ampersand in enumerations is appropriate, and perhaps even preferred, when one of the list items normally includes the word "and". For example, the following list specifies "place and route tools"
rather than place tools and route tools.
A significant improvement has been achieved recently in simulation, synthesis, and place & route tools.
Would an ampersand be appropriate in this case?
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Pocatello, Idaho Tue, Apr 6, 1999
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
That's an interesting use of the ampersand and I see some logic to it, but I'm not aware of any language authority recommending that particular usage. (That doesn't mean it isn't happening, just that I'm not aware of it.) I'll leave an e-mail icon here in case another user has some information on this use of the ampersand.
|
QUESTION |
How many spaces are there after a colon, one or two?
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Chicago, Illinois Wed, Apr 7, 1999
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
Nowadays, with word-processors, we use one space after both periods and colons. In days of yore, with monospace typewriters, we were taught to use two spaces, and this habit is very hard to change for some folks.
Authority: Publication Manual of the American Psychological Assocation American Psychological Association. 4th ed. American Psychological Association: New York. 1994. p. 244.
|
QUESTION |
Which sentence of the two is correct if indeed over the history of the university the classes have been ten to fourteen people large?
- The lady said that the classes at Columbia University are usually ten to fourteen people large.
- The lady said that the classes at Columbia University were usually ten to fourteen people large.
The rule in the section on tense squence says that the verb in the dependent clause must be in the past tense if the verb in the independent clause is in the past tense, unless the dependent clause express a general truth. Is this a general truth or a logical exception to the rule or what?
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Santa Fe, New Mexico Wed, Apr 7, 1999
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
It's the verb "said" that sets us up for the present tense here: she said (in the past, obviously) that this is (present tense) true. You see this kind of thing in newspaper accounts constantly: "The President said that the planes are continuing/will continue their operations." There's nothing wrong with your second sentence; however, that version would mean that it is no longer true that there are ten to fourteen people in each class. (Incidentally, a statement like that is not a very careful or precise use of numbers. Is the class size an average, a mean, or what? Averages can be meaningless when five senior classes have eight students but your freshman Intro to Psych class has two hundred.)
|