QUESTION |
Do you still use a comma between Washington, D.C. and have the periods been eliminated between DC? Thank you...I have seen it printed without a comma between Washington and DC. Please advise.
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Antioch, California Mon, Nov 16, 1998
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
The U.S. Post Office now prefers us to leave out the comma between city and state and to use the two-letter, all caps, abbreviation. (It has something to do with machine readability.) This also counts for Washington DC. But that's for what we write on envelopes. The rest of the time, in normal text, we would still use the comma and the periods in the abbreviation: Washington, D.C. I suppose the citizens of Washington, D.C., will have the final say in this matter.
|
QUESTION |
Please comment on usage of term " egg" in the following :-
- Question : What do you like to eat?
- Answer : I like to eat egg.
If the answer "egg" is acceptable, please explain why.
Thank you.
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Mon, Nov 16, 1998
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
No, we never use "egg" as an uncountable noun in this way. (We could say, for instance, "I like to eat cake.") Even when the eggs are uncountable (as in scrambled eggs), we still treat it as plural. (Although it is possible, I suppose, to eat one scrambled egg.) We would say, "I like to eat eggs."
|
QUESTION |
1.What is 'end focus' and 'end weight'?
2.What is the meaning differences between these following two sentences?
1) a.Everybody in this room speaks two languages.
b.Two languages are spoken by everybody in this room.
2) a.John gave the books to my brother.
b.John gave my brother the books.
3) a.John smeared paint on the wall.
b.John smeared the wall with paint.
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Pusan, Korea Mon, Nov 16, 1998
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
See the section on Sentence Variety for a brief description of sentence styles. "End focus" means building the sentence in such a way that the end of the sentence carries the most weight, the main idea or effect.
As for your sentences, the pairs mean the same. In #1, sentence "a" would be preferred by most writers over the passive construction in "b."
|
QUESTION |
Jennie was going to the store.
- The reason is because she needed milk.
- The reason is that she needed milk.
I made this question up, but I have a serious situation here. In 12th grade, my English teacher of my Expository Writing class told me the rule was "the reason is because (letter a)," but my College English teacher marked it wrong in my paper. When I confronted my current teacher about it, she replied, "It is a redundancy." I can see how it would be a redundancy, but I vividly remember my 12th grade English teacher telling my class and showing support that the correct answer is letter a. My English class is on Wednesday and I really would like some proof that the answer is letter a, if it is. If it isn't, I would still like proof, preferably that I could print out. A higher grade is at stake. Thank you so much for your time, and I hope someone can answer this for me.
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Santee, California Mon, Nov 16, 1998
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
I regard "the reason is because" as a redundancy (but it's not nearly as bad as "the reason why is because"). I prefer "the reason is that." However, that, too, is somewhat redundant, and you're better off if you can avoid this construction completely. She went to the store because she needed milk.
On the other hand, I don't know if I'd lower someone's grade because she used "the reason is because."
Authority: The St. Martin's Handbook by Andrea Lunsford, Robert Connors. 2nd ed. St. Martin's Press: New York. 1992.
|
QUESTION |
First of all, I want to thank you for answering a question I recently submitted. Now, as usual, I have another question. In this sentence: "For him to go is ridiculous." Is the object of the preposition "For" the whole clause "him to go" or only the pronoun "him." Someone tells me it's the whole clause, but my guess is the pronoun "him" alone. Please help again. And, thanks again.
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Las Vegas, Nevada Mon, Nov 16, 1998
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
"For him to go" is a phrase, not a clause. It's really unusual to use a prepositional phrase as a noun and subject in this way -- but not impossible. I would think that "him" is the object of the preposition, and the infinitive "to go" modifies the object of the preposition. And then the whole prepositional phrase becomes the subject of the verb "is." I will leave an e-mail icon in this response in case someone has a better idea.
|
QUESTION |
Can I end a sentence with "that" ? sentence I want to write....
It wasn't unusual to have 30 mile an hour winds on the high plains in springtime, but it seemed to be gusting much higher than that.
if this is incorrect, what would you suggest?
thanks
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Holland, Michigan Mon, Nov 16, 1998
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
Of course you can end a sentence with that. In fact, I just did. Or -- What about that? But I don't think I'd end your example sentence with "than that." Delete those last two words; you don't need them. (The sentence is OK with "higher than that," but isn't the "than that" a bit redundant?)
|
QUESTION |
In the sentence, "There are at least 30,000 species of spiders in the world", can you tell me what parts of speech 30,000 and species are?
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Jacksonville Beach, Florida Mon, Nov 16, 1998
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
Species is a noun, the subject of the sentence. The number 30,000 modifies that noun; it's acting as an adjective in this sentence. (Is it a bit more clear if you write out thirty thousand?)
|