QUESTION |
How please do I distinguish between ENquiry and INquiry? Is there a flexible usage?
By the way I am really amazed at this service. I live on these islands (population 10 on my island here; we speak English but most here have Irish as a first language. One of the few places in Ireland where this is found now.
any thanks and best wishes
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Capeclear Islands, West Cork, Ireland Tuesday, August 25, 1998
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
Those words are interchangeable variants of the same word. You would want to be consistent with their spelling, of course. I have a feeling that "inquiry" is much more common than "enquiry" on this side of the Atlantic, but I have no evidence of that.
|
QUESTION |
I know a lot about grammar, I took Advanced Grammar in high school, but one thing always leave me puzzled. The main thing that leaves me puzzled in grammar is the words lie, laid, lying, and laying. Those words always leave me confused. I know very little about the words.
Miss. Grammar, can you please explain those words to me and teach me to understand them all?
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Savannah, Georgia Tuesday, August 25, 1998
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
The differences between to lie (to recline) and to lay (to put down) are addressed as a Notorious Confusable. You should look at that and then take the quiz devoted to lie/lay. (See the Quiz List. I think it's #52.) If you still have questions, please get back to us.
|
QUESTION |
I was looking at a example of a cleft sentence: "It was the program of recruiting players from foreign countries that Coach Calhoun came up with."
Maybe, I am seeing things. But does this cleft sentence contain expletive
constructions? And do all cleft sentences have expletive constructions?
Thanks
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Unknown Tuesday, August 25, 1998
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
Yes, they do. That's not a particularly good sentence you've chosen (I have to say, even though I wrote it), but you get the idea. A cleft sentence is a way of drawing the reader's focus to a particular part of the sentence. "It was biology that most interested him." -- instead of "Biology interested him." A cleft sentence can be useful, but it can also very easily slip into a lazy and very tired construction -- and that's when we call it an expletive construction. It's sort of like the passive voice; we try to avoid it, but it does have its uses and it would be a mistake to banish it altogether.
|
QUESTION |
I have a Cost Analyis Report to write. This report required college level writing skills (post-secondary level education). I'd like to know whether I am using the right form of verb tense. (were, was, is, are)
example:
The consultant proposed an overhead of 181%. The prime consulted with the subcontractor before negotiation was discussed and agreed that 152% is/was fair and reasonable. The overhead rate of 152% were/was agreed and accepted by both parties.
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Washington, D.C. Tuesday, August 25, 1998
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
Your question is really about Subject-Verb Agreement, not tense. Since the 152% is being regarded as a sum, the singular "is" and "was" would be appropriate. It's rather rare, isn't it, to say that "negotiation was discussed"? Is that really what you mean? or do you mean "before negotations"?
|
QUESTION |
Which is correct? Friends is all we'll ever be or Friends are all we'll ever be?
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Washington, D.C. Wednesday, August 26, 1998
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
That's a good question. I think "friends," in this case, refers to the idea of being friends; I think it's singular, so we want "is." I wouldn't bet the farm on it, though, and I'll leave an e-mail icon here in case someone else has a better idea.
|
QUESTION |
1.All you have to do is subscribe now.
2.All you have to do is to subscribe now.
Which of the two sentences is correct? Explain grammatically,please.
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Bangkok, Thailand Wednesday, August 26, 1998
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
Your impulse to put the infinitive, "to subscribe," in that sentence is not entirely wrong. It is quite normal and correct, however, to drop the "to" in this construction. I don't know how to explain other than to say it's a matter of usage.
|
QUESTION |
Please, Grammar, explain to me your take on convince vs. persuade. Is it like imply vs. infer, in the sense of "After you persuaded me, I was convinced that you were correct"? Persuade, then, would the giver; convince would be the receiver. Thanks in advance for your light and wisdom.
|
SOURCE OF QUESTION & DATE OF RESPONSE |
Seattle, Washington Wednesday, August 26, 1998
|
GRAMMAR'S RESPONSE |
No, it's not the same as the difference between imply and infer. Think of convince in terms of someone's convictions: I will convince you that something is true. Think of persuade in terms of what you will do, now, on the basis of these convictions: I will persuade you to join a cult. The differences are not all that great, really, but if you think of persuade in terms of action, convince in terms of mind-set, you'll do OK.
|